Can a Simulation-Based Training Program Impact the Use of Evidence Based Routine Practices at Birth? Results of a Hospital-Based Cluster Randomized Trial in Mexico

Fritz, Jimena; Walker, Dilys M.; Cohen, Susanna R.; Angeles, Gustavo; & Lamadrid-Figueroa, Hector. (2017). Can a Simulation-Based Training Program Impact the Use of Evidence Based Routine Practices at Birth? Results of a Hospital-Based Cluster Randomized Trial in Mexico. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0172623. PMCID: PMC5358738

Fritz, Jimena; Walker, Dilys M.; Cohen, Susanna R.; Angeles, Gustavo; & Lamadrid-Figueroa, Hector. (2017). Can a Simulation-Based Training Program Impact the Use of Evidence Based Routine Practices at Birth? Results of a Hospital-Based Cluster Randomized Trial in Mexico. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0172623. PMCID: PMC5358738

Octet Stream icon 10068.ris — Octet Stream, 2 kB (2,754 bytes)

BACKGROUND: In Mexico, although the majority of births are attended in hospitals, reports have emerged of obstetric violence, use of unsafe practices, and failure to employ evidence-based practices (EBP). Recent attention has refocused global efforts towards provision of quality care that is both patient-centered and evidence-based. Scaling up of local interventions should rely on strong evidence of effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To perform a secondary analysis to evaluate the impact of a simulation and team-training program (PRONTO) on the performance of EBP in normal births. METHODS: A pair-matched cluster randomized controlled trial of the intervention was designed to measure the impact of the program (PRONTO intervention) on a sample of 24 hospitals (12 hospitals received the PRONTO training and 12 served as controls) in the states of Chiapas, Guerrero, and Mexico. We estimated the impact of receiving the intervention on the probability of birth practices performance in a sample of 641 observed births of which 318 occurred in the treated hospitals and 323 occurred in control hospitals. Data was collected at 4 time points (baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th months after the training). Women were blinded to treatment allocation but observers and providers were not. Estimates were obtained by fitting difference-in-differences logistic regression models considering confounding variables. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: # NCT01477554. RESULTS: Significant changes were found following the intervention. At 4 months post-intervention an increase of 20 percentage points (p.p.) for complete Active Management of Third Stage of Labor (AMTSL) (p = 0.044), and 16 p.p. increase for Skin-to-Skin Contact (p = 0.067); at 12 months a 25 p.p. increase of the 1st step of AMTSL (p = 0.026) and a 42 p.p. increase of Delayed Cord Clamping (p = 0.004); at 4 months a 30 (p = 0.001) and at 8 months a 22 (p = 0.010) p.p. decrease for Uterine Sweeping. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention has an impact on adopting EBP at birth, contributing to an increased quality of care. Long lasting impacts on these practices are possible if there were to be a widespread adoption of the training techniques including simulation, team-training and facilitated discussions regarding routine care.




JOUR



Fritz, Jimena
Walker, Dilys M.
Cohen, Susanna R.
Angeles, Gustavo
Lamadrid-Figueroa, Hector



2017


PLOS ONE

12

3

e0172623








PMC5358738


10068

Wink Plone Theme by Quintagroup © 2013.

Personal tools
This is themeComment for Wink theme