Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health

Glassman, Amanda; Duran, Denizhan; Fleisher, Lisa; Singer, Daniel; Sturke, Rachel; Angeles, Gustavo; Charles, Jodi; Emrey, Bob; Gleason, Joanne; Mwebsa, Winnie; Saldana, Kelly; Yarrow, Kristina; & Koblinsky, Marge. (2013). Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 31(4 Suppl. 2), 48-66. PMCID: PMC4021703

Glassman, Amanda; Duran, Denizhan; Fleisher, Lisa; Singer, Daniel; Sturke, Rachel; Angeles, Gustavo; Charles, Jodi; Emrey, Bob; Gleason, Joanne; Mwebsa, Winnie; Saldana, Kelly; Yarrow, Kristina; & Koblinsky, Marge. (2013). Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 31(4 Suppl. 2), 48-66. PMCID: PMC4021703

Octet Stream icon 8331.ris — Octet Stream, 2 kB (2,261 bytes)

Maternal and newborn health (MNH) is a high priority for global health and is included among the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, the slow decline in maternal and newborn mortality jeopardizes achievements of the targets of MDGs. According to UNICEF, 60 million women give birth outside of health facilities, and family planning needs are satisfied for only 50%. Further, skilled birth attendance and the use of antenatal care are most inequitably distributed in maternal and newborn health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been shown to increase health service utilization among the poorest but little is written on the effects of such programmes on maternal and newborn health. We carried out a systematic review of studies on CCT that report maternal and newborn health outcomes, including studies from 8 countries. The CCT programmes have increased antenatal visits, skilled attendance at birth, delivery at a health facility, and tetanus toxoid vaccination for mothers and reduced the incidence of low birthweight. The programmes have not had a significant impact on fertility while the impact on maternal and newborn mortality has not been well-documented thus far. Given these positive effects, we make the case for further investment in CCT programmes for maternal and newborn health, noting gaps in knowledge and providing recommendations for better design and evaluation of such programmes. We recommend more rigorous impact evaluations that document impact pathways and take factors, such as cost-effectiveness, into account.


Population and Health Policies and Programs
1C
2d


JOUR



Glassman, Amanda
Duran, Denizhan
Fleisher, Lisa
Singer, Daniel
Sturke, Rachel
Angeles, Gustavo
Charles, Jodi
Emrey, Bob
Gleason, Joanne
Mwebsa, Winnie
Saldana, Kelly
Yarrow, Kristina
Koblinsky, Marge



2013


Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

31

4 Suppl. 2

48-66








PMC4021703


8331

Wink Plone Theme by Quintagroup © 2013.

Personal tools
This is themeComment for Wink theme