The Four U’s: Latent Classes of Hookup Motivations among College Students

Uecker, Jeremy E.; Pearce, Lisa D.; & Andercheck, Brita. (2015). The Four U’s: Latent Classes of Hookup Motivations among College Students. Social Currents, 2(2), 163-81. PMCID: PMC4825812

Uecker, Jeremy E.; Pearce, Lisa D.; & Andercheck, Brita. (2015). The Four U’s: Latent Classes of Hookup Motivations among College Students. Social Currents, 2(2), 163-81. PMCID: PMC4825812

Octet Stream icon 9131.ris — Octet Stream, 1 kB (1534 bytes)

College students’ “hookups” have been the subject of a great deal of research in recent years. Motivations for hooking up have been linked to differences in well-being after the hookup, but studies detailing college students’ motivations for engaging in hookups focus on single motivations. Using data from the 2010 Duke Hookup Survey, we consider how motivations for hooking up cluster to produce different classes, or profiles, of students who hook up, and how these classes are related to hookup regret. Four distinct classes of motivations emerged from our latent class analysis: Utilitarians (50 percent), Uninhibiteds (27 percent), Uninspireds (19 percent), and Unreflectives (4 percent). We find a number of differences in hookup motivation classes across social characteristics, including gender, year in school, race-ethnicity, self-esteem, and attitudes about sexual behavior outside committed relationships. In addition, Uninspireds regret hookups more frequently than members of the other classes, and Uninhibiteds report regret less frequently than Utilitarians and Uninspireds. These findings reveal the complexity of motivations for hooking up and the link between motivations and regret.




JOUR



Uecker, Jeremy E.
Pearce, Lisa D.
Andercheck, Brita



2015


Social Currents

2

2

163-81








PMC4825812


9131

Wink Plone Theme by Quintagroup © 2013.

Personal tools
This is themeComment for Wink theme