A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility

Tan, Poh Lin; Morgan, S. Philip; & Zagheni, Emilio. (2016). A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 327-50.

Tan, Poh Lin; Morgan, S. Philip; & Zagheni, Emilio. (2016). A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 327-50.

Octet Stream icon 9425.ris — Octet Stream, 1 kB (1357 bytes)

Household spending on children’s pre-tertiary education is exceptionally high in Japan and South Korea, and has been cited as a cause of low fertility. Previous research attributes this high spending to a cultural emphasis on education in East Asian countries. In this paper, we argue that institutional factors, namely higher education and labor market systems, play an important role in reinforcing the pressure on parents to invest in their children’s education. We review evidence showing that graduating from a prestigious university has very high economic and social returns in Japan and South Korea, and examine the implications for fertility within the framework of quantity–quality models. Finally, we put forward ‘reverse one-child’ policies that directly address the unintended consequences of these institutional factors on fertility. These policies have the additional virtues of having very low fiscal requirements and reducing social inequality.




JOUR



Tan, Poh Lin
Morgan, S. Philip
Zagheni, Emilio



2016


Population Research and Policy Review

35

3

327-50










9425

Wink Plone Theme by Quintagroup © 2013.

Personal tools
This is themeComment for Wink theme