Does Addressing Gender Inequalities and Empowering Women and Girls Improve Health and Development Programme Outcomes?

Taukobong, Hannah F. G.; Kincaid, Mary M.; Levy, Jessica K.; Bloom, Shelah S.; Platt, Jennifer L.; Henry, Sarah K.; & Darmstadt, Gary L. (2016). Does Addressing Gender Inequalities and Empowering Women and Girls Improve Health and Development Programme Outcomes? Health Policy and Planning, 31(10), 1492-514.

Taukobong, Hannah F. G.; Kincaid, Mary M.; Levy, Jessica K.; Bloom, Shelah S.; Platt, Jennifer L.; Henry, Sarah K.; & Darmstadt, Gary L. (2016). Does Addressing Gender Inequalities and Empowering Women and Girls Improve Health and Development Programme Outcomes? Health Policy and Planning, 31(10), 1492-514.

Octet Stream icon 9697.ris — Octet Stream, 2 kB (2,726 bytes)

This article presents evidence supporting the hypothesis that promoting gender equality and women's and girls' empowerment (GEWE) leads to better health and development outcomes. We reviewed the literature across six sectors-family planning (FP); maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH); nutrition; agriculture; water, sanitation and hygiene; and financial services for the poor-and found 76 studies from low and middle-income countries that met our inclusion criteria. Across these studies, we identified common GEWE variables that emerged repeatedly as significant predictors of sector outcomes. We grouped these variables into 10 thematic categories, which we termed 'gender-related levers'. These levers were then classified by the strength of evidence into Wedges, Foundations and Facilitators. Wedges are gender-related levers that had strong associations with improved outcomes across multiple sectors. They include: 'control over income/assets/resources', 'decision-making power' and 'education'. Elements of these levers overlap, but combined, they encapsulate agency. Increasing female agency promotes equality and broadly improves health and development for women, their families and their communities. The second classification, Foundations, displayed strong, positive associations across FP, MNCH and nutrition. Foundations have a more proximal relationship with sector outcomes and include: 'equitable interpersonal relationships', 'mobility' and 'personal safety'. Finally, the third group of levers, Facilitators, was associated with improved outcomes in two to three sectors and include: 'access to information', 'community groups', 'paid labour' and 'rights'. These levers make it easier for women and girls to achieve their goals and are more traditional elements of development programmes. Overall, gender-related levers were associated with improvements in a variety of health and development outcomes. Furthermore, these associations were cross-sectoral, suggesting that to fully realize the benefits of promoting GEWE, the development community must collaborate in co-ordinated and integrated ways across multiple sectors. More research is needed to identify the mechanisms by which gendered interventions work and under what circumstances.




JOUR



Taukobong, Hannah F. G.
Kincaid, Mary M.
Levy, Jessica K.
Bloom, Shelah S.
Platt, Jennifer L.
Henry, Sarah K.
Darmstadt, Gary L.



2016


Health Policy and Planning

31

10

1492-514










9697

Wink Plone Theme by Quintagroup © 2013.

Personal tools
This is themeComment for Wink theme