Asking Questions to Understand Rural Livelihoods: Comparing Disaggregated vs. Aggregated Approaches to Household Livelihood Questionnaires

Reference Type:
Journal Article

Secondary Title:

Series Title:

Author(s):
Jagger, Pamela
Luckert, Marty K.
Banana, Abwoli
Bahati, Joseph

Editor(s):

Series Author(s):

Year Published:
2012

Date Published:

Journal Name:
World Development

Volume Number:
40

Issue Number:
9

Start Page Number:
1810-23

End Page Number:

Edition:

Series Volume:

Publisher:

City of Publication:

ISSN/ISBN:

DOI:
10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.030

PMCID:

NIHMSID:

Reference ID:
5358

Miscellaneous:

Abstract:

This study tests the hypothesis that both disaggregated and aggregated data collection methods produce similar estimates of the relative importance of livelihood portfolio activities and expenditures. The results show that different methods of data collection yield substantively different estimates of livelihood strategies for two indicators: income and expenditure. We also find evidence of a seasonal bias in responses to household livelihood questions asked at higher levels of aggregation. Our findings highlight the challenge of designing household surveys to elicit accurate and precise information, and demonstrate that different methods of data collection influence our understanding of rural livelihoods.

Keyword(s):

URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.030

Notes:

RIS Export File:
Octet Stream icon

5358.ris — Octet Stream, 1 kB (1,148 bytes)

Citation:

Jagger, Pamela; Luckert, Marty K.; Banana, Abwoli; & Bahati, Joseph. (2012). Asking Questions to Understand Rural Livelihoods: Comparing Disaggregated vs. Aggregated Approaches to Household Livelihood Questionnaires. World Development, 40(9), 1810-23.