Neighborhood Size and Local Geographic Variation of Health and Social Determinants [Open Access]

Ali, Mohammad; Park, Jin Kyung; Thiem, Vu Dinh; Canh, Do Gia; Emch, Michael E.; & Clemens, John D. (2005). Neighborhood Size and Local Geographic Variation of Health and Social Determinants [Open Access]. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(1), 12. PMCID: PMC1156930

Ali, Mohammad; Park, Jin Kyung; Thiem, Vu Dinh; Canh, Do Gia; Emch, Michael E.; & Clemens, John D. (2005). Neighborhood Size and Local Geographic Variation of Health and Social Determinants [Open Access]. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(1), 12. PMCID: PMC1156930

Octet Stream icon 3532.ris — Octet Stream, 2 kB (2,436 bytes)

Background: Spatial filtering using a geographic information system (GIS) is often used to smooth health and ecological data. Smoothing disease data can help us understand local (neighborhood) geographic variation and ecological risk of diseases. Analyses that use small neighborhood sizes yield individualistic patterns and large sizes reveal the global structure of data where local variation is obscured. Therefore, choosing an optimal neighborhood size is important for understanding ecological associations with diseases. This paper uses Hartley's test of homogeneity of variance (Fmax) as a methodological solution for selecting optimal neighborhood sizes. The data from a study area in Vietnam are used to test the suitability of this method.
Results: The Hartley's Fmax test was applied to spatial variables for two enteric diseases and two socioeconomic determinants. Various neighbourhood sizes were tested by using a two step process to implement the Fmaxtest. First the variance of each neighborhood was compared to the highest neighborhood variance (upper, Fmax1) and then they were compared with the lowest neighborhood variance (lower, Fmax2). A significant value of Fmax1 indicates that the neighborhood does not reveal the global structure of data, and in contrast, a significant value in Fmax2 implies that the neighborhood data are not individualistic. The neighborhoods that are between the lower and the upper limits are the optimal neighbourhood sizes.
Conclusion: The results of tests provide different neighbourhood sizes for different variables suggesting that optimal neighbourhood size is data dependent. In ecology, it is well known that observation scales may influence ecological inference. Therefore, selecting optimal neigborhood size is essential for understanding disease ecologies. The optimal neighbourhood selection method that is tested in this paper can be useful in health and ecological studies.


Place, Space, and Health
Population and Environment


JOUR



Ali, Mohammad
Park, Jin Kyung
Thiem, Vu Dinh
Canh, Do Gia
Emch, Michael E.
Clemens, John D.



2005


International Journal of Health Geographics

4

1

12








PMC1156930


3532

Wink Plone Theme by Quintagroup © 2013.

Personal tools
This is themeComment for Wink theme