Menu Close

Impact Evaluation of a Social Protection Programme Paired with Fee Waivers on Enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme

Citation

Palermo, Tia M.; Valli, Elsa; Angeles, Gustavo; de Milliano, Marlous; Adamba, Clement; Spadafora, Tayllor Renee; Barrington, Clare; & LEAP 1000 Evaluation Team, (2019). Impact Evaluation of a Social Protection Programme Paired with Fee Waivers on Enrolment in Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme. BMJ Open, 9(11), e028726. PMCID: PMC6858157

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to understand the impact of integrating a fee waiver for the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with Ghana's Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) 1000 cash transfer programme on health insurance enrolment.
SETTING: The study was conducted in five districts implementing Ghana's LEAP 1000 programme in Northern and Upper East Regions.
PARTICIPANTS: Women, from LEAP households, who were pregnant or had a child under 1 year and who participated in baseline and 24-month surveys (2497) participated in the study.
INTERVENTION: LEAP provides bimonthly cash payments combined with a premium waiver for enrolment in NHIS to extremely poor households with orphans and vulnerable children, elderly with no productive capacity and persons with severe disability. LEAP 1000, the focus of the current evaluation, expanded eligibility in 2015 to those households with a pregnant woman or child under the age of 12 months. Over the course of the study, households received 13 payments.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included current and ever enrolment in NHIS. Secondary outcomes include reasons for not enrolling in NHIS. We conducted a mixed-methods impact evaluation using a quasi-experimental design and estimated intent-to-treat impacts on health insurance enrolment among children and adults. Longitudinal qualitative interviews were conducted with an embedded cohort of 20 women and analysed using systematic thematic coding.
RESULTS: Current enrolment increased among the treatment group from 37.4% to 46.6% (n=5523) and decreased among the comparison group from 37.3% to 33.3% (n=4804), resulting in programme impacts of 14 (95% CI 7.8 to 20.5) to 15 (95% CI 10.6 to 18.5) percentage points for current NHIS enrolment. Common reasons for not enrolling were fees and travel.
CONCLUSION: While impacts on NHIS enrolment were significant, gaps remain to maximise the potential of integrated programming. NHIS and LEAP could be better streamlined to ensure poor households fully benefit from both services, in a further step towards integrated social protection.

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028726

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year Published

2019

Journal Title

BMJ Open

Author(s)

Palermo, Tia M.
Valli, Elsa
Angeles, Gustavo
de Milliano, Marlous
Adamba, Clement
Spadafora, Tayllor Renee
Barrington, Clare
LEAP 1000 Evaluation Team,

PMCID

PMC6858157