Tortoises 1, Hares 0: How Comparative Health Trends between Canada and the United States Support a Long-Term View of Policy and Health

Download as .RIS

Citation

Hertzman, Clyde & Siddiqi, Arjumand A. (2008). Tortoises 1, Hares 0: How Comparative Health Trends between Canada and the United States Support a Long-Term View of Policy and Health. Healthcare Policy, 4(2), 16-24. PMCID: PMC2645214

Abstract

Fifty years ago, Canadian and US life expectancies were roughly equal. Now, however, Canadians are, on average, healthier than Americans. To discover the reasons behind this trend, the authors compared Canada and the United States on a range of determinants of health based on data from 1950 to the present. Their analysis yielded three conclusions: (1) greater economic well-being and spending on healthcare did not yield better health outcomes; (2) public provision and income redistribution trump economic success where population health is concerned; and (3) the gradual development of public provision represents the build-up of social infrastructure that has long-lasting effects on health status. The authors contend that in the context of thinking about population health, the historical, dynamic approach casts a clearer light on trends than does the cross-sectional approach.

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year Published

2008

Journal Title

Healthcare Policy

Author(s)

Hertzman, Clyde
Siddiqi, Arjumand A.

PMCID

PMC2645214